The Oneness of Being

Rosabel Ansari - Summary Quotes

-last modf 1446 AH, 2025-05-09 21:00 +0200, bit.ly/_1br   [506]  index
pic17 4min read

From: The Oneness of Being, by Rosabel Ansari
This is an edited summary of the original text by Rosabel Ansari with subtitles and edited quotes including in the footnotes.


1. What Exists in the World?

What can we say exists in the world? What is there? When we look around and perceive the world with our senses, it seems self-evident that multiple things are in existence.[1]

But it is equally true that none of these things have to be there. Islamic theology teaches us that our own being, and the being of all of creation, is contingent. We do not have to exist; our existence depends on God.

On the other hand, God is the Necessary Being whose essence is to be.

However, if it is the essential nature of God to be (i.e., God cannot not be), can other things also be said “to be”? Can we attribute being to both God and creation?
And if so, how can we do so without reifying[2] being?

“This doctrine, known in Arabic as waĥdat al-wujūd (the oneness of being)… claims that God is the only being, and there is nothing else besides Him.”[3]

If we say that anything else exists besides God, we are saying so … metaphorically, because otherwise we would devolve into pantheism, whereby God is in things or is a part of things.[4]

2. God Is True Being (wujuud)

True existence is for God alone, … and this is the true meaning of divine oneness (tawĥīd).

What is this thing called being that we attribute to both God and creation?[5] Would being not become prior to and above God, with God and creation different species of the greater category of being?

To avoid making being into a thing or category greater than God—and to avoid pantheism by making creation a part of God’s being, adherents of waĥdat al-wujūd taught that God is the only true Being.[6]

3. Sense Perception Regarding Reality

Do the objects of our sense perception (i.e., the things we can see, touch, hear, taste, and smell) exist simply because we perceive them?[7]
Comment: yes, these objects exist, but their existence is contingent, fleeting and volatile.

Figures such as Qūnawī and Qayśarī considered that “creation does not have an independent existence, but only has a relation (nisbah) to the Being that is God.”[8].

4. Things as Fixed Entities in God’s Knowledge

There is another way to describe the presence of creation around us, even if it cannot be truly said to be. In response to this problem, advocates of waĥdat al-wujūd qualify created[9] things as fixed[10] entities (al-a¢yān al-thābitah) in God’s knowledge. Their existence is not a real existence; rather, they are constrained within divine knowing, possessing a mere relation to divine being through God’s knowledge of them.

Therefore “we can say that through your sense perception, you are not perceiving anything real. The existence of creation, and indeed your own existence, is simply that God has knowledge of you, and this divine knowledge is what constitutes creation, as opposed to any sort of real existence.”[11]

5. The Point of It All?

What purpose does it serve to say that nothing really exists except God, and that all the things we perceive (including our own selves) are just items of divine knowledge?[12]

With the advent of the clear monotheism of Islam, it became crucially important to understand what it means to attribute being to anything other than God. To say that something is (existing), is to make a serious metaphysical claim about that thing.[13]

6. How to Account for a Multiplicity of Existing Things?

One way to account for a multiplicity of things that exist, while still maintaining a distinction between the being of God and the being of creation, is through the theory of the rankings of being (marātib al-wujūd). This theory … gives us a layered, gradated way to attribute being and existence to created things.

According to this theory, there are three rankings to existence:
(1) actual, extra-mental existence, which is attributed to things that are real;
(2) mental existence, which is attributed to things that exist only in the mind; and
(3) linguistic existence, which is attributed to things we speak or write about.

The theory of marātib al-wujūd does not solve the problem we have been discussing, as it still remains to be seen what is truly real and existent outside the mind, but this theory does add another dimension to the solution. By affirming multiple levels (multiplexity) to being, Islamic scholars rejected the flattening of being and the notion that a thing either is or is not. There are different dimensions to being, and their different rankings mean that our answers to philosophical questions may differ according to what realm or ranking of being we are functioning on.[14]


We are convinced Islam is the answer and the way - and there is no god except Allah (God), the Lord of the universe - no reality, but the reality of the Real (Allah), and Mohammad is certainly His Messenger (may His blessings & peace be upon him).

- Islam - The Way of the Prophets
- Islam the Natural, Easy Religion
- The Sum Of Islam


47h


Living Islam - Islamic Tradition
[livingislam] [All Pages] [New Texts] [Muḥyiddīn Ibn ʿArabi] [Understanding God] [Islamic Concepts]  [Islamic Resources] [Sh Gibril F Haddad] [Islam - Questions] [sotwe] [Contact]



Related

Other Texts in This Series

link-in Muhyiddin Ibn ʿArabi; Presentation of Some 29 Texts
link-in Muhyiddin Ibn `Arabi; Presentation of Over 30 Texts
link-in The Possible Things
link-in The Veil of Otherness
link-in Being and Existence 1
link-in Being and Nonexistence 2
link-in Wujūd and Infinity
link-in Being, Names, and Nonexistence
link-in Acquiring Knowledge
link-in The Nonexistent Entities
link-in Insights Into The Nature Of Being And Existence
link-in Sh. Muhyiddin Ibn al-ʿArabī And the Unfolding of the Islamic Intellectual Tradition
link-in How God Brought The Cosmos Into Existence Disclosing Himself, M. Ibn ʿArabi



Footnotes

  1. “In Islamic thought, waĥdat al-wujūd has been argued and defended philosophically as a part of metaphysics, exegesis, and ethics.”
     ↩
  2. “making [being] into a thing or category greater than God.” (make (something abstract) more concrete or real)
     ↩
  3. “If you take a second look around you, this would mean that nothing you see truly exists, and in fact, neither do you.” This point will be explained in what follows.
     ↩
  4. “This argument says that God is essentially Being, or pure existence, so it is not possible to attribute being or existence to anything other than God, as that would be like saying that thing is a part of God.” This point will be explained in what follows.
     ↩
  5. when talking about ‘being’ it is important to remember that ‘wujuud’ translated as being or existence always also has the connotation of ‘finding’, meaning something which can be found and which therefore can be known, at least to a degree.
     ↩
  6. Among such adherents were scholars and saints such as Śadr al-Dīn al-Qūnawī (d. 673 AH/1274 CE) and Dāwūd al-Qayśarī (d. 751/1350). Qūnawī, who was the son-in-law and chief disciple of al-Shaykh al-Akbar Muĥyī al-Dīn b. al-¢Arabī (d. 638/1240), was also an associate of the famous poet Jalāl al-Dīn al-Rūmī (d. 672/1273) and prayed the funeral prayer at his passing. For his part, Qayśarī is famous for having been the chair of the first Ottoman madrasah in Iznik, modern-day Turkey.
     ↩
  7. Many of us may find it hard to accept that what we perceive does not exist in any way whatsoever, as this would lead to problems relating to our consciousness and knowledge of our perception.
     ↩
  8. Yet, even if we accept that creation does not have an independent existence, and hold that creation cannot truly be said to be or exist in a real sense, we are still left with a problem. We do at least seem to experience our own being and existence, and also that of everything around us. How do we make sense of it, if it does not truly exist?

    Comment: Creation and our being exists, but this kind of existence is contingent, fleeting and volatile. (It will be further explained in what follows.)
     ↩
  9. The created things may have been brought into existence in the cosmos or not, they are always in the divine knowledge of God.
     ↩
  10. the original article has immutable, but it is better to call it fixed entities.
     ↩
  11. But as mentioned below, there are levels or ranks of reality, it’s not either/ or, existence/ nonexistence.
     ↩
  12. It might seem that we are making a problem out of nothing, because from a theological standpoint, whether we truly attribute existence to creation or not, everything is under the omnipotent control of God’s will. It might seem that calling creation “immutable entities of divine knowledge,” rather than “concrete existent beings,” is just a word game.
     ↩
  13. Is it really possible to say there is anything except for God? The Qurʾan tells us in the Chapter of the Most Compassionate: “All that is on Earth will perish, but the face of your sustainer, full of majesty and bounty, will last forever” (Kullu man ¢alayhā fān wa yabqā wajhu rabbika dhū al-jalāli wa al-ikrām, 55:26–27).

    Some interpretations might take this verse to mean that nothing other than God can truly be said to be, as everything other than God will perish. The Arabic for “will perish” is the term fān, an active participle that can be translated as “is in the state of perishing.” As everything in creation perishes, and is in the state of perishing, can we truly attribute being to creation in the same way we say that God, the ever-living, is? The meanings of words have significance that, in turn, have ramifications for our beliefs about the world.

    Moreover, attributing being to creation, and to ourselves, also raises ethical considerations in the path of purification of the soul (tazkiyat al-nafs). To think of ourselves as existing alongside God is problematic from the standpoint of crushing the ego. For the adherents of waĥdat al-wujūd, on the practical level, let alone the theoretical level just outlined, we do not exist, because we are perishing in the face of God. The sense of self and existence outside of God is abolished in this path.
     ↩
  14. Rosabel Ansari: This essay has not been an attempt to … merely to elucidate the philosophical stakes and the philosophical position of waĥdat al-wujūd. Regardless of what view one takes of waĥdat al-wujūd, the notion that being is multiplex can greatly illuminate our understanding of how the divine relates to our world. In fact, if explored more, the multiplexity of being has the potential to be an important contribution to today’s philosophical landscape.
     ↩

-page from 2025-05-09 1446 AH  pic17