Debt Cancellation,

Economic Parasites and Love of Money

-last modf 2024-03-28 15:45 +0100, bit.ly/_dcep   [004]  index
pic17 12min read

1. Economies are not automatically self-correcting
2. The Islamic Interest-Free Economy
3. Cancelling Interest-Bearing Debt
4. How the Popes of the Middle Ages Introduced Debt and Interest
5. How Middle Ages Popes legitimized the charging of interest
6. Other Scholars on the Matter of Debt and Interest
7. Socrates on the Love of Money

1. Economies are not automatically self-correcting

1.1 Intro
Economies are not automatically self-correcting, as standard economists would tell you, this is a modern myth.[16] How debt and interest emerged in human history and formed ancient economic relations, has been researched by scholars, such as Michael Hudson and David Graeber. Regarding debt and interest in more recent, pre-capitalistic conditions, were reseached by Karl Marx, who is also quoted here.
Michael Hudson[7] is an expert in economic history and particularly the development of debt and interest since Babylonian times, where perodical debt cancellation was the norm.

David Graeber is also critical towards the general/ default understanding that debts always have to be paid back, no matter what.

Karl Marx showed already in the 1860ies that debt and interest, if not regulated, while enriching the donor class, will lead to an increased polarization and ultimately to the destruction of the economy. This is exactly the past we are on today.

This is contrasted with the precise stand of Islam against interest, declaring interest taking among the worst offenses.[n1]
In this respect Islam continues and improves on the legacy of ancient civilisations, in what is true and beneficial.

1.2 Arnaud Bertrand
This is an absolutely fascinating talk by economist Michael Hudson. He explains that debt cancellation was always a central problem in economics: as far back as you go in history, there always periodically come times when debts have accumulated too much and "there's no automatic self-correcting economy", this is a myth.

He posits that the way the current western economic system is set up, with the holding of debt privatized and distributed, makes debt cancellation close to impossible, basically entrenching the problem and cementing the constitution of an oligarchy of creditors.

He opposes this to China, which "centralized money creation, debt creation, banking and credit as a public utility", which makes it much easier for them to cancel debts if and when they accumulate, and avoid the construction of that creditor oligarchy and the social problems it creates.


2. The Islamic Interest-Free Economy

2.1 All Interest is forbidden in Islam by the Lawgiver (Allah)
Islam has a very clear and distinct position on interest and usury. Whereas in western societies, already in the Middle Ages,[3] there was a distinction between the two (interest and usury), in Islam, every increase of money exchange for debt payment, or other, is haram, forbidden.

{ الَّذِينَ يَأْكُلُونَ الرِّبَا لَا يَقُومُونَ إِلَّا كَمَا يَقُومُ الَّذِي يَتَخَبَّطُهُ الشَّيْطَانُ مِنَ الْمَسِّ ذَٰلِكَ بِأَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا إِنَّمَا الْبَيْعُ مِثْلُ الرِّبَا وَأَحَلَّ اللّٰهُ الْبَيْعَ وَحَرَّمَ الرِّبَا }
{Those who consume interest cannot stand (on the Day of Resurrection) except as one stands who is being beaten by Satan into insanity. That is because they say, "Trade is (just) like interest." But Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden interest.}
Quran 2-175

2.2 Why Is Riba/Interest Prohibited?
The main reason riba is prohibited is the concept that it makes the rich richer and the poor poorer. There is an inequality in the dealings between the parties that is frowned upon in Islam. Interest is seen as perpetuating and often increasing the gap between rich and poor humans in society.[2]

2.3 Hesham M. Sharawy
Simply stated, Islamic law prohibits interest because it fosters the accumulation of wealth that is not a product of work. That the concepts of work and [lawful or] unlawful gain in Islam are central to the life of every Muslim cannot be disputed. The accumulation of wealth from interest is contrary to these fundamental ideals.

2.4 Hesham M. Sharawy - a business example
It is clear that Mohamed (for his restaurant), could have realized his dream under the Islamic banking and finance system now existing. For instance, the mudaraba transaction could have financed his venture interest-free.
Mohamed, as entrepreneur, would use the capital of the rabbul-mal or investor to finance his business. He would then share the profits with the rabbul-mal, and both parties to the transaction would be satisfied much like the result under the capitalist system.
Furthermore, the goals of Islam, under this transaction, have been satisfied. Mohamed can use his wealth as a means to satisfy the beneficent goals of the Islamic faith such as Zakah.

Under the musharaka financing method, Mohamed could combine his capital with that of a lender, thereby forming a partnership in which they would share the profits of the restaurant commensurate with the amount of capital invested by each partner.
Again, Mohamed could both achieve his goal of becoming a successful entrepreneur while also satisfying the obligation he has to Allah (God) and his faith.
Source: Understanding The Islamic Prohibition Of Interest[8]

2.5 The Islamic View on Debt
Islam does not prohibit debt; it recognises the fact that people may face circumstances that necessitate borrowing. However, it emphasises caution, responsibility, and most importantly, the intention and effort to repay the debt promptly. One of the foundational elements in Islamic financial ethics is the prohibition of 'Riba' (usury or interest). This reflects, among many other things, the Islamic principle of social justice, ensuring that the burden of risk is not disproportionately placed on the borrower and preventing exploitative lending practices. Here, the Shariah protects the borrowers and debtors. The Shariah encourages lenders to go easy with debtors, and in fact, Shariah promotes helping those struggling with interest-free loans as well as grants. (+ hadith)[10]
Source: The Islamic Perspective on Debt[10]



We believe Islam is the answer and the way - and there is no god except Allah (God) - no reality, but the reality of the Real (Allah), and Mohammad is certainly the Messenger of Allah (may His blessings & peace be upon him).
- Islam - The Way of the Prophets
- Islam the Natural, Easy Religion
- The Sum Of Islam

3. Cancelling Interest-Bearing Debt

3.1 - Prof. Michael Hudson:
"There's a blind spot in Western civilization, not only of how civilization really began in the ancient Near East and then diffused, but also about the basic dynamic that has polarized western economies and is leading today to the western economies polarizing just in the way that Rome's empire ended in a dark age."

"The regular need to cancel interest-bearing debt was woven into the beginning of civilization... this idea of restoring economic order was based on the understanding that there's no automatic self-correcting economy, which is the myth of modern time that is promulgated by oligarchs." via COMBATE |🇵🇷

"Once you realize that, you realize that today, why is it that China is pulling ahead? Because it centralized money creation, debt creation, banking and credit as a public utility, which is how it was all over ancient society." via @upholdreality[9]

Prof. Michael Hudson: "There's a blind spot in Western civilization, not only of how civilization really began in the ancient near East and then diffused, but also about the basic dynamic that has polarized western economies and is leading today to the western economies… There's a blind spot in Western civilization

— COMBATE |🇵🇷 (@upholdreality) March 17, 2024
How did debt begin?


4. How the Popes of the Middle Ages Introduced Debt and Interest

Prof. Michael Hudson @00:50:00 in [7]
Well, the Catholic Church essentially took debt out of the Lord's Prayer [the economic meaning of the word: culpa, German Schuld].
And by the 13th century, actually already by the 12th century, when you had the Roman Church waging the Crusades against the other Christians, people think the Crusades were against Islam. It was mainly against other Christians to subordinate them to Rome.

And in order to fight the Cathars in southern France, in order to fight the Germans who resisted paying tribute to Rome, in order to avoid paying, the leading Christian Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church of Constantinople, the popes hired (there were) warlords (coming in), the Normans, warlords coming into Europe. And the church, i.e. the popes made a deal beginning around 1050 (first of all, with southern Italy and Sicily), a deal that “we will recognize Robert Guiscard as the king, if you pledge fealty to become a Roman vassal state … and we'll make sure that the population supports you. But you have to kill all the Christians, and they're the real Christians who were loyal to Constantinople. And you have to kill the Byzantine areas there.”

Then in 1066, they made a deal with another warlord, William the Conqueror, that “well, we'll say that you're the king, but you have to pay us Peter's pence and tribute. And if you have to pay us tribute, you have to let us nominate the bishops, so we make sure that you're not going to keep the church and gum for yourself, but they'll pay it to us, the popes.”

And the whole 13th century was all about this fight between the local aristocracy and trying to stop the kings from borrowing money from the bankers who were sponsored by the Vatican, by Rome, to lend money to the Norman kings to fight the enemies of Rome.

And that's how the Magna Carta came into being, under King John, and reaffirmed under his son, Henry III, to limit his ability to go into debt.[15]
The Pope, I think (it was) Pope Innocent III, excommunicated anyone who was opposing paying interest to the bankers, Italian bankers who they sponsored, to make the loans to the king to go fight in southern Italy and Sicily against the Germans, who had gained influence there.

So you had Christianity ending up worshipping debt, not its cancellation. This is not in most histories of the Crusades, but the first crusade was against Sicily, southern Italy, and England. And it was on the basis of that the Pope then was able to mobilize all massive armies to end up attacking Constantinople and what is now Yugoslavia, and take over the alternative churches to Rome.


5. How Middle Ages Popes legitimized the charging of interest

During the Middle Ages, the charging of interest, known as usury, was widely condemned by religious authorities, including the Popes. The prohibition against usury was deeply rooted in Christian theology and was based on biblical passages that condemned lending money at interest, particularly to the poor. However, over time, there were instances where Popes and other religious authorities made exceptions or found justifications for allowing interest to be charged under certain circumstances. Here are some ways in which the charging of interest was legitimized by Popes during the Middle Ages:

1. Just Price Theory: Some theologians and scholars argued that as long as interest rates were reasonable and did not exploit the borrower, they could be permissible. This idea was rooted in the concept of the "just price," which suggested that economic transactions should be fair and equitable for both parties involved.

2. Doctrine of Necessity: In cases of extreme necessity, such as during times of war or economic crisis, Popes sometimes permitted the charging of interest. This was based on the principle that lending money in such circumstances served a greater good and was necessary for the survival or stability of society.
Cont. [12]


6. Other Scholars on the Matter of Debt and Interest

6.1 Karl Marx
Usury centralizes money wealth where the means of production are dispersed. It does not alter the mode of production, but attaches itself firmly to it like a parasite and makes it wretched. It sucks out its blood, enervates it and compels reproduction to proceed under ever more pitiable conditions.[4]

6.2 David Graeber
There are obvious reasons why this is a particularly important moment to reexamine the history of debt.

September 2008 saw the beginning of a financial crisis that almost brought the world economy screeching to a halt. In many ways the world economy did: ships stopped moving across the oceans and thousands lay idle or were even broken up for scrap metal.
Building cranes were dismantled, as no more buildings were being put up. Banks largely ceased making loans.

In the wake of this, there was not only public rage and bewilderment, but the beginning of an actual public conversation about the nature of debt, of money, of the financial institutions that have come to hold the fate of nations in their grip.[6]

6.3 Yanis Varoufakis
About conventional economists blinded by their quantitative models of capitalism, which the love.
But understanding modern capitalism is something else:
There are two weird markets, they don't function like normal markets:
- the labour market (not about human creativity), but surplus value.
- the financial sphere,
Source: Varoufakis - Economics & Capitalism - YouTube[14]


7. Socrates on the Love of Money

Retold by Prof. Michael Hudson @00:27:10 in [7]
Socrates was talking to an Athenian. He was complaining about the fact that he has to pay a debt to somebody.

Socrates said, "Well, you know, do you really have to repay something you borrowed?
Suppose that somebody has lent you a weapon, and you know that if you give that you need, maybe you need to fight in the army for a while or whatever reason, you have to give him back his weapon. But you know that he's a psychotic killer. You know that he's a dangerous man. Is it right to repay a debt to give the weapon back to this man who you know is going to use it to injure other people?" And the Athenian isn't really sure.

And Socrates says, "Well, let's then talk about this debt that you owe. Suppose you give the money back to the creditor, and the creditor uses this money to lend to other people, and he lends to a poor cultivator, and the cultivator ends up having to work off the debt by working on the creditor's land, not on his own land.
And suppose that the creditors get together, and they take over society, and all of a sudden they're running the government, and they're exploiting society, and it's a crisis. Is it right that you should repay these people?"

The Athenian says, "Well, you know, why would creditors act in so self-destructive a way? Can we just have really smart rulers that are going to prevent this kind of crisis?"

And Socrates says, "Well, there's something about the mentality of wealthy people that's called wealth addiction, or money love. And you have Athenian drama. Irastauphinis(?) writes plays about wealth addiction and hubris causing a downfall." And Socrates says, "It's really very much like hubris. They can't help but just wanting more and more."

□ comment:
This is the truth of the matter, and if we have never heard about it, we will assume that all people are kind and reasonable, looking for the best interest of everyone, more or less at least.

The teaching of the Quran tells us a different story: it is the love of this lower world (dunya), and it is the drive to always have more, the desire to amass riches for its own sake.

{ أَلْهَاكُمُ التَّكَاثُرُ }

{The desire to have more of the worldly gains have pre-occupied you so much (that you have neglected remembring God)}

All kinds of people can have something of this weird behaviour (hoarding), but when it is about money and the possibility to increase capital, it is something different, as it will have an impact on the whole economy, and in the end, it will make the society wretched.

What is the difference between consuming food and 'consuming' or earning money according to (not only) Socrates?[13]


  1. More comments

    - - responding to Georgios Zervakis - -

    COMBATE |🇵🇷 @upholdreality
    Hudson makes the case that Solon forgave the debts but did not redistribute the land and as a result was unpopular and it was up to Pisistratus and later leaders to actually bring democracy.


    Georgios Zervakis @GeorgiosZervak1
    I merely said that it was the start, therefore not trying to contradict Hudson. Also, Peisistratus ruled as a tyrant. We can take a lesson by each fact.


    COMBATE |🇵🇷 @upholdreality
    Interestingly Hudson also says in the full interview that ancient history has been falsified and written from the point of view of the oligarchs, including smearing populists and reformers as tyrants.

    - - responding - -

    Georgios Zervakis @GeorgiosZervak1
    Yes. We did not discover propaganda just recently. But some info is literally written in stone, by various authors. Not unlike today, that we try to extract the truth by the collective of information and the interpretation of it. He was a tyrant & a popular one, maybe even just.

    - - responding to the above OP - -

    Econgrad @Econgrad5143
    I dunno, but basing a modern economy on ancient myths seems a reach.

    Code of HammurabiPortion of the Hammurabi code

    Georgios Zervakis @GeorgiosZervak1
    Which part is a myth? The Hammurabi code or the reform by Solon? Maybe your education is a myth cause what he mentions is actual history. Or do you simply think that we went from cavemen to iPhones? Do you think the ancients were idiots and you somehow are the smart one? Dude…

    Don't blame the guy, this is our ethnocentricity - our default mentality - that we think we are the best ever in creation, which we of course we are not all.

  2. Source: What is Riba in Islam?

    Islam prohibits any transaction that is seen as exploitative, and profiting from lending is seen as exploitative.

    Many Muslims in Western societies are unaware that there are financial services and products that are compliant with Sharia law, and they therefore continue to accrue debts and interest on credit cards, mortgage loans, and bank loans.

    However there are risks:
    Investors in these shares can lose 100% of the money they invested, as SME businesses can fail.
    [ □ comment: The web-admin is not affiliated in any way to their business.]

  3. Regarding interest (riba') in the Middle Ages read [ch. 4] and/ or watch from about @51 (in the complete video, see fn7) where Michael Hudson talks about how the Church of Rome introduced interest and used it for political purposes of power and domination. Some related texts:
    - When did the Catholic Church explicitly start allowing Christians/Catholics to make interest-based loans ('usury')? What were the key events? - Quora
    - How did the Catholic Church's views on usury change over time? - Quora

  4. Quotes Regarding Usury in Pre-Capitalist Relationships, Karl Marx

    The characteristic forms, however, in which usurer's capital exists in periods antedating capitalist production are of two kinds…

    First, usury by lending money to extravagant members of the upper classes, particularly landowners; secondly, usury by lending money to small producers who possess their own conditions of labour — this includes the artisan, but mainly the peasant, since particularly under pre-capitalist conditions, in so far as they permit of small independent individual producers, the peasant class necessarily constitutes the overwhelming majority of them.

    Both the ruin of rich landowners through usury and the impoverishment of the small producers lead to the formation and concentration of large amounts of money-capital. But to what extent this process does away with the old mode of production, as happened in modern Europe, and whether it puts the capitalist mode of production in its stead, depends entirely upon the stage of historical development.


    The usury which sucks dry the small producer goes hand in hand with the usury which sucks dry the rich owner of a large estate. As soon as the usury of the Roman patricians had completely ruined the Roman plebeians, the small peasants, this form of exploitation came to an end and a pure slave economy replaced the small-peasant economy. In the form of interest, the entire surplus above the barest means of subsistence (the amount that later becomes wages of the producers) can be consumed by usury (this later assumes the form of profit and ground-rent)…


    Usury centralizes money wealth where the means of production are dispersed. It does not alter the mode of production, but attaches itself firmly to it like a parasite and makes it wretched. It sucks out its blood, enervates it and compels reproduction to proceed under ever more pitiable conditions.

    Source: Capital Vol. III Part V, 
Division of Profit into Interest and Profit of Enterprise. Interest-Bearing Capital
    Chapter 36. Pre-Capitalist Relationships

    Economic Manuscripts: Marx: Capital Vol. 3 Ch. 36

  5. Relief of burdens - a set of laws by Solon (c. 590 BC)

  6. He also said that "markets are founded and usually maintained by systematic state violence", though he goes on to show how "in the absence of such violence, they… can even come to be seen as the very basis of freedom and autonomy".
    Debt - The First 5000 years, David Graeber

  7. Apart from the short video excerpt on this page, here is the complete video:
    Michael Hudson: Marxism, Economic Parasites, and Debt Cancellation - YouTube

  8. Understanding The Islamic Prohibition Of Interest: A Guide To Aid Economic Cooperation Between The Islamic And Western Worlds. By Hesham M. Sharawy, J.D. 2001, The University of Georgia.

  9. 4b. Georgios Zervakis
    - - responding to the above OP - -
    Ancient Athenians came to the same conclusion even though the debts were not owned by the palace, as you mentioned. That was the keystone to proceed to democracy, lifting the debt burden. Not the ultimate solution but definitely a good start.[1] @GeorgiosZervak1
    More: Relief of burdens - a set of laws by Solon (c. 590 BC)[5]

  10. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, "A man would give loans to the people and he would say to his servant: If the debtor is in hardship you should forgive the debt that perhaps Allah will relieve us. So when he met Allah, then Allah relieved him." Sahih Bukhari

     It is also encouraged to give respite or deferment to the debtor if he is unable to pay on time. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “Whoever gives respite to one in difficulty, he will have (the reward of) an act of charity for each day. Whoever gives him respite after payment becomes due, will have (the reward of) an act of charity equal to (the amount of the loan) for each day.” Sunan Ibn Majah,
    via The Islamic Perspective on Debt

  11. There were five patriarchates, Constantinople … Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, and Rome was at the very bottom of the list. It was a disaster in the whole 10th century.

    Even the Catholic Church says, well, this was the pornocracy, the rule by the Harlots, when local families were able to just appoint their own members as Popes.

    So I didn't realize, I'm now writing a history of debt from the crusade to the modern times, and I didn't realize how the whole context for the reappearance of debt in the Western civilization was all led by the Church, culminating in the Medici Pope Leo the 10th in 1515 having a big conference legitimizing the charging of interest ever since.

    I mean, it's just, if you look at the history of how economies have evolved and how society has evolved from the point of view, what are their debt relations?

    You get a completely different perspective of causality and what has been shaping the politics, the political system, the social system, religion, the social values, and you realize how the big fights of all of the Church Council, the economic fights, the peasants revolutions of the 14th century, 15th century onward, they were all about debt.

    And yet the topic is as expurgated from thought today as much as sex wasn't talked about before Freud. Because what I want to do for debt is what Freud did for sex. It really is important. That's awesome. Speaking of compound interest and the book we're talking about today, Killing the Host, it should be obvious to our listeners from the title that the main analogy you're drawing is between something and then a parasite.

  12. Continuation from the article.
    3. Loopholes and Legal Fictions: In some cases, legal fictions or loopholes were used to circumvent the prohibition against usury. For example, lenders might disguise interest payments as fees for services or as penalties for late payment. This allowed them to charge interest indirectly while technically remaining within the bounds of the law.

    4. Non-Christian Borrowers: In dealings with non-Christians, particularly during the Crusades and other military campaigns, there was often greater leniency regarding usury. Since the prohibition against usury was primarily directed at interactions between Christians, lending at interest to non-Christians was sometimes considered acceptable.

    5. Economic Realities: As medieval society evolved and became more complex, the strict prohibition against usury became increasingly difficult to enforce. With the rise of commerce and banking, there was growing pressure to adapt to changing economic realities, leading to a more pragmatic approach to the charging of interest.

    Overall, while the charging of interest remained controversial throughout the Middle Ages, Popes and other religious authorities occasionally found ways to justify or legitimize it in certain circumstances, reflecting the tension between religious doctrine and economic necessity.

    "When discussing the legitimization of charging interest during the Middle Ages, ChatGPT provided insights into various strategies employed by Popes to justify this practice." chat.openai.com

  13. Socrates explained that the whole basis of modern neoclassical trade theory is absolutely wrong. Neoclassical trade theory says when you get more bananas, you get satiated, and each new banana gives you less and less pleasure, and so you want to drop it.

    But Irastauphinies and Socrates and the whole of Athenian drama and philosophy in the fourth century said,
    "Love of money is not like eating bananas. Money, unlike food, money is addictive, and the wealthy class," Socrates says, "are going to get so addictive that they're going to just pursue their self-interest and greed of their money love to destroy society." And the Athenian says, "Well, you know, isn't there something? You know, there must be some way. How do we get out of this trap?"

    And Socrates said, "Well, for one thing, you're going to have a very special kind of ruler. You're not going to want to pick your ruler from the rich families, because if they come from the rich family, they're going to grow up with wealth addiction, with money addiction. You're going to have to have the ideal ruler not have a wealth of his own."

    And he described, how do you get somebody that's freed from this creditor disease. That's what the Republic is all about.

  14. Yanis Varoufakis - Economics & Capitalism - YouTube or
    (643) Yanis Varoufakis: From an Economics without Capitalism to Markets without Capitalism | DiEM25 - YouTube "You have to choose as a political economist, as a citizen, whether price stability is more important than the fact that some people starve."

  15. Unable to confirm the statement "to limit (the king's) ability to go into debt", except that "the Magna Carta promised … limitations on feudal payments to the Crown."
    Magna Carta - Wikipedia

  16. "Economies are not automatically self-correcting," this was proven wrong not later than in the 2008 (Lehman Br.) economic crisis.

-page from 2024-03-19