Edits and comments by Omar KN
bit.ly/_trgl
R. Guénon’s idea and rediscovery[1] of Tradition proves ”that
the modern world is not the result of progress out of darkness, but of
descent into darkness, that this — the time we live in — is a last age,
a pretty low point of a last age at that. What has been lost — and what
needs to be recovered, reinstated even — is ’tradition’. And tradition
can be fairly precisely defined, as the truths that” have been sent down,[2] or ”have been handed down from time immemorial, … the original Ur-religion of humanity.”
This is the dīnu-l qayyim, the eternal, ever-lasting spiritual way of ascent to the Divine (knowledge).
[1]: This is not a school - such as when supposing that “Guénonian Traditionalism is a school inspired by Guénon, and taking various different forms,” but a metaphysical point of view, or of inspiration. Different authors may share their critical view of modernity, but would have to propose a spiritual medicine against it, which they mostly failed to do.
[2]: Sedgwick writes: ”as the truths that should have been handed down.” But they have been handed down.
“Traditionalists[8] are those who want to recover[3] what has been lost, and who also recognize the "true" nature of modernity. And recognize that one of the most important aspects of modernity is inversion — that the world sees the valuable as worthless and the worthless as valuable, the good as bad and bad as good. ... And with that comes "counter-initiation" — religious movements[9] that are actually irreligious, that actually lead away from what religion is meant to lead to. ... Against counter-initiation, the only thing left is real, genuine initiation — into traditional esoterism.”
[3]: This recovery is ”in full swing” in the West and in several countries in the East. Many flowers are flourishing and trees finding their roots.
[9]: Not just 'religious movements', but more and more political, exclusivist movements.
[8]: Concepts such as ”Traditionalism” or ”Traditionalists”, are useful for academics or orientalists, but easily misunderstood, see above fn1.
“Still less would (many Muslims in the Islamic world) think much of his idea of the fundamental unity of all religions.[4] Sure, there have been and are dissenting voices, but the overwhelming consensus among Muslims is that other religions are just plain wrong.[5] That's very different from the standard Traditionalist view.”
[4]: The ’idea of the fundamental unity of all religions,’ in this expressively stated form was not R. Guénon’s , but F. Schuon’s idea.
Guénon’s concern was to rediscover the traces (and principles) of tradition in the many religious forms of the world. His purpose was not to propose some ’super-religion’, as his detractors contend.
[5]: Answer to this proposition: To say that older religions before Islam are no longer ”up to the mark” and therefore not valid for the salvation of man, is different from saying they are ”just plain wrong.” We cannot and must not try to restrict the mercy of the All-Merciful.
For the individual person the final decision is upon God as expressed in the Holy Quran:
{ So whoever does an atom’s weight of good will see it… }
99-7/8
and
{ My mercy encompasses all things…}
7-156
“Traditionalism at the start was more or less an intellectual movement — find the true religion of mankind, that sort of thing. And then after Guénon had been in Cairo for a while, had been living with Islam — which is a religion that really emphasizes daily practice — suddenly it was all about practice. Well, perhaps not all about — the intellectual element stayed. But practice was really emphasized, became really very important. And that was because of Islam, I'm almost certain.”[6]
[6]:
Of course it was Islam, which still was - and is today - a living religion, because it offers the intellectual insights, and practical methods to tread the path for inner enlightenment to reach the Divine Presence.
There is simply no authentic tradition, such as Islam, if there is no spiritual practice. Many verses in the Holy Quran together with the prophetic practice ﷺ focus on this principle.[10]
“Yes, I think that's exactly it. Although Traditionalism defines itself in terms of what it is for — tradition, the religio perennis and so on — in some ways it's a lot easier for an observer like myself to define Traditionalists partly in terms of what they are against. And what they are against is modernity. And you can't be against modernity until you have experienced it.”
“Now, Iran and Turkey are the two countries in the Middle East that have most experienced modernity. Morocco has a bit, too, and that's where in the Arab world you find Traditionalism most important. There are no Traditionalists at all, so far as I know, in mountain villages in the Yemen. None of it would make any sense at all there. This is actually part of the point you made earlier about Traditionalism being, in many ways, essentially modern.”
“I call those who look for a firm anchoring in their own or some other religion those for whom Traditionalism is a "stepping stone" — it gets them somewhere, whether to Sufi Islam or Russian Orthodoxy or whatever, and then they just get on with where they are. Traditionalism may remain interesting to them, but it isn't the main point. But then there are those for whom Traditionalism remains the main point, and for some of these it is indeed a sort of supra-religion.”[7]
[7]: This
question has been answered in:
On The Common Eternal Principles, And That Islam Reigns
“In Bosnia, there's a man called Rusmir Mahmutcehajic. He was a minister in the Bosnian government, but then resigned, essentially over the division of Bosnia — which he didn't want. Nowadays, he's one of Bosnia's most important public intellectuals, and runs an important institute. ... His views would be very different without the influence of Guénon; he would hardly be him. It's almost like the "stepping stone" phenomenon I was talking about before. Traditionalism wasn't a stepping stone to Islam for Mahmutcehajic, since he was a Muslim anyhow, though it may have been a stepping stone to the sort of Islam he now practices. Most importantly, it was an essential stepping stone to his mature intellectual positions. He's a perfect example, but there are others with more access to the general Western culture.” (see below for the book*).
...
*Mark Sedgwick, Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004, 368 pages.
The interview with Mark Sedgwick was conducted by Jean-François Mayer. Mark Sedgwick is associate professor in the Department for the Study of Religion at Aarhus University in Denmark.
The complete interview is here
( religion.info )
Religioscope, 5 Jun 2004
"When man is imprisoned like this in life and in the conceptions directly connected with it, he can know nothing about what escapes from change, about the transcendant and immutable order, which is that of the universal principles"
René Guénon, East And West, p.90
Related texts
Shaykh Abd Al Wahid Yahya - René Guénon
The Story of Hadith, by Sh. G. F. Haddad
10: Robert Anthony Bolton said: To know that other faiths are not valid, rejected by God, one would have to know things about the inside of other souls which must be beyond our grasp. However, I do not extend such tolerance to the neo-pagan cults which flourish today, because they are concocted from written sources, not from any kind of revelation.
expired link (before 2017) - seriousseekers.com
□ comment: In Islam we have the isnād, authentic chains of transmission! See: The Story of Hadith, by Sh. G. F. Haddad
↩
